Second-Look Reviews — Pakistan & the Gulf
A report is on your desk. Does it hold up?
An independent review of an existing investigation or technical report, before you rely on it. We test whether the evidence supports the conclusions, whether alternative explanations were considered, and what remains open.
Input
An existing investigation or technical report
Question for us
Does the evidence support the conclusion?
Turnaround
Typically faster than a full investigation
Deliverable
Written review with open questions
Since the 1990s
30
years investigating
250+
investigations closed, incl. HiPOs
15
countries served
20+
countries of lead seminars
100+
nationalities trained
How an instruction runs
From notification to a report you can rely on.
Typical sequence for a major loss. Timing is agreed with you for each instruction.
1 · First call
What you have
You send the report and its evidence; we confirm the scope and turnaround.
2 · Receive
The report
The existing report and every source it relies on, read in full.
3 · Test
Evidence vs conclusion
Each conclusion checked against the evidence cited, and alternatives considered.
4 · Gaps
What is missing
Missing periods, parties and records identified in the timeline.
5 · Review
Fit to rely on
A written review stating what can be relied on, and what remains open.
The questions insurers ask us
Choose the question. See how we answer it.
What we establish
Whether each conclusion follows from the evidence cited.
Evidence we rely on
The report, its evidence index and source records.
Where we stop
Facts on one side. Decisions on the other.
Established by P3i
The sequence of events
The cause and contributing conditions
Whether stated controls were in place
What remains uncertain, stated plainly
Reserved to the insurer
Policy interpretation and coverage
Quantum and adjustment
Legal advice and proceedings
The relationship with the insured
A loss notified this week? A first call costs nothing, and we will tell you what should be preserved before the site is cleared.
Ways to instruct us
One loss, or your whole book.
a.Single instructionOne loss, one agreed scope and timeline.b.Panel appointmentAgreed scopes, response times and report formats across your book.c.Second lookAn independent review of a report you have received.d.Pre-loss surveyA risk survey written from real loss experience.
The P3i approach
How we investigate a loss for insurers. Fact-finding, not fault-finding.
Every P3i investigation is led by a senior investigator and supported by internationally qualified process specialists. You will not receive a list of people to blame, or a long list of generic actions. You will receive the facts, the proven causes, and a short plan that closes the gaps, in this case and across your system.
Independent
No products, repairs or contracts to sell you afterwards.
Senior-led
Thirty years of investigation, from the first call to the final briefing.
Beyond the event
Process specialists find the other cracks before they fail.
Ready to present
Written for boards, buyers, insurers and regulators.
How P3i does it for you
- 01
Read the report cold
As a challenger would.
- 02
Test evidence against conclusions
Link by link.
- 03
Look for what was not considered
Alternatives and missing periods.
- 04
Visit only if needed
Many reviews are desk-based.
- 05
Say plainly what holds
And what does not.
What you receive
Call us when
Free 30-minute case assessment.
Tell us what happened. In confidence, we will tell you what the investigation should cover, how long it will take and what to preserve today.
How we work with you
What happens after you call.
For an insurance instruction, the first call covers the loss, the parties involved, what must be preserved and the scope you need. From there, this is the usual pattern.
First hour
A call with a lead investigator. You leave it knowing what to preserve today and who to call next.
Day one
An investigator on site, anywhere in Pakistan. Scope and fixed fee agreed in writing.
Week one
A private briefing on early findings, so urgent risks are dealt with before the report is finished.
Weeks three to four
The final report, the wider system review and a remedial work plan, presented to your team.
After
We come back to check the actions were completed and actually worked.
Typical timings for a single-site event. Complex, multi-party matters take longer, and we tell you so on the first call.
What you receive
A full investigation report. This is only its first page.
The summary is what leadership reads first. Behind it sits the complete file: every witness heard, every document and record examined, and every finding tied to numbered evidence, so a board, an insurer, a buyer or a regulator can test it.
1 · Established sequence
2 · Causes
3 · Wider system findings
4 · Remedial work plan
Illustrative summary page. Report length and structure depend on the scope of each case.
Inside the full report
- 01Executive summary SHOWNThe findings and actions leadership needs, on one page. This is the page shown here.
- 02Terms of reference & scopeThe questions asked, the boundaries of the investigation and who commissioned it.
- 03MethodHow evidence was gathered, and which analysis methods were chosen for this case, and why.
- 04Verified chronologyThe sequence of events, reconstructed from records, data and accounts, minute by minute where it matters.
- 05Site & technical examinationScene, equipment, failed parts, measurements and photographs, with specialists where needed.
- 06Witness evidenceInterview schedule, accounts in summary, and where the witnesses agree and where they conflict.
- 07Documents & recordsPermits, procedures, maintenance, training, rosters, CCTV, tracker and control-system data reviewed.
- 08Causal analysisImmediate, underlying and system causes, each one tied to numbered evidence.
- 09System reviewWhere the same weaknesses exist elsewhere in the operation.
- 10Findings & conclusionsWhat is proven, what is probable, and what remains open, stated plainly.
- 11Recommendations & work planTargeted actions, each with an owner, a date and a test of whether it worked.
- 12AppendicesEvidence register, photograph log, interview records, drawings and data extracts.
Every action has an owner, a date and a test of whether it worked. The evidence stays indexed, so any reader can check how each conclusion was reached.
From our files
See all 16 cases → Client names, people, locations and dates removed.
Questions
What claims teams ask us first.
Do you need to visit the site?
Not always. Many reviews are desk-based, with a site visit where the gaps require it.
Will you tell us if the report is sound?
Yes. A second look can confirm a report as readily as it can question it.
Can you review reports from any source?
Yes: the insured’s own investigation, a contractor’s report or another expert’s.